> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.bramadams.dev/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Books are Best (Proven By Science!)
- URL: https://www.bramadams.dev/books-are-best-proven-by-science/
- Published: 2025-02-08T23:07:13.000Z
- Updated: 2025-02-08T23:29:23.000Z
- Description: -
- Author: Bram Adams
- Tags: essays

## consumption tier list:

looking at entire categories of ontological consumption aka media

the core metric is the below criteria x the value received for time and effort given.

go in w an open mind.

**criteria:**

1. depth possible
2. breadth available
3. accessibility
4. flow state possible
5. async/sync
6. energy minimum to consume
7. attention required
8. roi
  1. future earnings
  2. eudaemonia (human flourishing)
  3. good memory
  4. learning
  5. feeling of completion

**contenders:**

- books
- movies
- tv shows
- live concerts
- social media feeds
- news/podcasts/radio
- sitting and doing nothing (control)

---

- books
  - 1\. yes -- deep topics of philosophy, history, sports, memoir... 250 pages on average per book. super deep dives.
  - 2\. yes – walk through the sections of any library. every human ontology exists in books. in fact we created an entire ontology around lying and called it fiction
  - 3\. library card/books online \~$10-20, can be an expensive hobby
  - 4\. yes, if book is compelling and challenging
  - 5\. async, you can read books from authors who died last millenia. insane value of voices from different languages/different cultures/the dead.
  - 6\. non passive -- you must turn pages and comprehend words in head
  - 7\. full attention – if half assed you're not really reading or even skimming (skimming well is a skill)
  - 8.
    - a. a good book can change your career opportunities ++ all college courses are foundationally built around the books assigned teamed up with the teacher
    - b. books (philosophy, classic) change lives consistently -- the intellectual life is honorable in and of itself, see the virgin mary or st augustine etc
    - c. yes, with services like ycb and readwise you can store your marginalia and highlights forever and connect them
    - d. see a and b
    - e. they call it closing a chapter on life for a reason...

---

- movies
  - 1\. yes – art house movies exist – cinephiles perfect the form alongside their critics and actors
  - 2\. yes -- not as much as books. a younger medium and much more costly to produce, so less space for creativity thats not bankrolled
  - 3\. easier these days w streaming services -- but fragmented to get the best movies on each
  - 4\. similar to books a storyline can be extremely compelling
  - 5\. async, but less movies than books bc the art form is much younger. aka its harder to get movies outside of your time and place than books.
  - 6\. can be consumed passively – story is on a plate, often can be assessed deeper after by researching director
  - 7\. second screen possible so not that much (how many times do you see people at phones out at movies)
  - 8.
    - a. i think movies have helped me at social situations like dates, but the ideas in them rarely spark new outcomes
    - b. a good movie can change your life -- usually on an emotional rather than intellectual level
    - c. no, the movie capture for later reflection is draconic – nflx just added moments feature and files are so heavy, or you have to bootleg record on your phone. it sucks.
    - d. documentaries are good i guess? but ive literally never seen a documentary that teaches me more than a book. especially in modern era with docs all being aliens on history channel style
    - e. letterboxd do be going off fr

---

- tv shows
  - *(im bored so im gonna zoom through rest of these)*
  - 1\. not these days, all good shows are cancelled constantly it fkn sucks
  - 6/7\. even less attention required than movies -- complete brain rot in many cases
  - 8.
    - b. a few golden eggs (hxh, breaking bad, the wire, etc.) amongst a sea of garbage (still much higher quality than social media). many tv shows treat viewers like idiots.
    - e. depends on if it gets cancelled or not...

---

- live concerts
  - 2\. lotsa good stuff out there
  - 3\. lower than the others, but kind of the point
  - 5\. sync, but again, kind of the point
  - 7\. usually pretty engaging but i have fallen asleep at shows that havent hooked me. i usually last 30m or so before i get bored, but if i love the show, its a visceral experience. high variability.
  - 8.
    - a. negative, very expensive hobby
    - c. very high, very memorable
    - d. not usually – too much reliance on stimulants

---

- social media feeds
  - 1\. absolutely fucking not. single punchline 60 second content or drawn out 15 minute video with two minutes of utility (a day in my life videos)
  - 2\. probably highest or competing with books for most breadth. a lot of people with cameras. demerits for the glut of internet comedians, im sick of all these comedians.
  - 3\. always a tap away
  - 6/7\. hyper passive brain rot, you know im right
  - 8.
    - b. unless you make content for social media, it is bad for your agency and dignity long term. the hours required, nothing gained.
    - c. i remember very little of what i consume. sub 10% perhaps? theres too much with no depth.
    - e. you are never done doom scrolling, there is no bottom

---

- podcasts/radio
  - 4\. good while doing something else like chores or driving
  - 7\. bad proxy for reading books, i hate when people say audiobooks are just as memorable as reading, its not. (audiobooks are great, but are so easy to zone out during, dont lie to yourself)
  - 8\.  
    - a. less than books, but higher than anything else on list
    - d. some long form conversations are genuinely a waste of two+ hours, others can be life changing. rng.

---

- news
  - 1\. nope. more focused on being omnipresent than research
  - 2\. see above
  - 4\. a bad one of fear, yes
  - 7\. face.scared.exe (see 4)
  - 8.
    - a. sure if you trade stocks but by time its news its too late
    - b. absolutely fucking not no, every person i know who watches news constantly is miserable
    - e. 24 hour cycle so by definition, no

---

- sitting and doing nothing (control)
  - 1\. very much so yes, if you let yourself get there
  - 2\. echo chamber literally
  - 3\. always available if you are willing to turn off distraction
  - 4\. yes, but youll likely fall asleep, sustained attention is difficult
  - 7\. high, its telling that its much higher than social media consumption. think about the ramifications of this
  - 8.
    - b. know thyself. nuff said
    - d. some lessons are only found in solitude
    - e. can go forever, will end up in recursive fever dream style hell at times

tier list:

s: books (best)

a: sitting and doing nothing, movies (best), live shows (best)

b: books (avg/worst)

c: tv shows (best), live shows (avg/worst), podcasts (best)

d: movies (avg, worst), news (best)

e: also sitting and doing nothing (its both amazing and awful), tv shows (avg, worst)

f: social media feeds, news (avg, worst), podcasts (avg/worst)