Skip to content

Live Chats Suck for Information Dense Transfers

Bram Adams
Bram Adams
1 min read

Table of Contents

Live chat (Slack, Teams, etc.) sucks for important discussions. Thinking one line at a time lowers the quality of the discussion. Knee jerk rapid fire responses become the norm. Conversations that last weeks or even days get lost and context gets fuzzy. Threads scroll up into the past and are never seen again. Despite the “asychronous” claim, you have to keep a steady eye on it and reply in realtime or the conversation will move on without you. Anyone who takes the time to ponder and respond thoughtfully with context and explanation will find that they’re too late. If you go on vacation or even take a few hours of focused time for deep work, you come back to hundreds or thousands of messages. Often your only option is to declare chat room bankruptcy which means missing out on important discussions and big decisions. I’m not saying live chat is useless. It’s great at some things: In other words, live chat is for the things that can get lost. Rule of thumb: If a discussion will matter after today, don’t have it in a chat room. Check out Discource, Twist, Carrot, Threads, Basecamp, Flarum, or heck even GitHub issues. These tools exist for a reason. They solve a real problem. They encourage longer form responses rather than quick one liner replies. They show you a list of threads with titles for maximum skim-ability. They let you sort (by last comment, for example) and filter threads or archive them once a decision has been reached. They don’t show online/offline indicators or timezone notifications or “XYZ is typing…” because nobody expects a quick response anyway. Some of them even support multi-level (Reddit-style) threading, which can help if a lot of people are involved.

Live chat SUCKS for anything with a bit of substance. The call-and-response nature completely kneecaps trains of thought, and creates group brainstorms (which are proven highly ineffective) with depth levels of n=1 or n=n at most (threads with child comments).

The only comment systems I like support threads and even then there is always some additional cognitive load of understanding parent and child comment context.


Bram Adams

writer, programmer


Related Posts

Members Public

Cheap Wins and ChatGPT

People don’t really want innovation People talk about innovation a whole lot, but what they are usually looking for is cheap wins and novelty. If you truly innovate, and change the way that people have to do things, expect mostly negative feedback. If you believe in what you’re

Members Public

Give Recruiters an Inch They Take a Mile Bro

Is this crazy? Yes. LinkedIn really flies under the radar as the social media platform that’s absolutely the most unhinged (View Tweet) Me, after deleting the 100th outbound email of the day (View Tweet)

Members Public

The Birth of the Steve Jobs Entrepreneur

Ehrenberg’s book allows us to connect some big dots. The liberation of the individual from various identities, obligations, and allegiances in the 1960s gave a new flavor to our economic individualism. The economics of the right became infused with the moral fervor of the youthful left in a grand